Gun Rights Don’t Come from the Second Amendment | Mises Wire

Constitution-Declaration

The Second Amendment, like the First Amendment, doesn’t give anyone any rights. Instead, it prohibits the federal government from infringing on rights that are natural and God-given and that preexist government.

Source: Gun Rights Don’t Come from the Second Amendment | Mises Wire

This is the point that is too-often missed on people today – whether due to ignorance or willful misinformation. As this article so accurate states,

“Whenever there is a gun massacre, statists inevitably respond that it’s time to repeal the Second Amendment. The idea is that if the Second Amendment is gone, so will be the right to own guns in the United States.

“There is just one big problem with that position: It’s wrong. The Second Amendment, like the First Amendment, doesn’t give anyone any rights. Instead, it prohibits the federal government from infringing on rights that are natural and God-given and that preexist government.

“The Declaration of Independence sets forth the essential principles. Every person (i.e., not just American citizens) is endowed by nature or God with fundamental rights. These include life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

“Thus, given that people’s rights are natural and God-given, they preexist government. The rights come first and the government comes second.”

That is to say, the Bill of Rights does not give anyone rights. It simply enumerates the God-given rights that already exist. Even if it were (God forbid!) repealed, that would not change the facts; the rights themselves would continue to exist. You cannot vote to repeal natural law; you cannot vote to repeal what God has given.

Indeed, the very legitimacy of a government to exist, in our American system, is based on its ability and willingness to protect the rights of the people: this is the basis of government “by consent of the governed.” A government which fails to protect the natural, God-given rights of the people has lost its legitimacy. I wish more people understood this!

Conservative Activist, Journalist Lauren Southern Detained at Calais, Banned From Entering UK

The government of the UK has banned Canadian conservative activist and journalist Lauren Southern from Britain, being held at Calais just days after Austrian activist Martin Sellner and American author Brittany Pettibone were refused entry at Heathrow.

Source: Conservative Activist, Journalist Lauren Southern Detained at Calais, Banned From Entering UK

So, once-Great Britain, which stood firm against Nazi Germany and was our greatest ally against the Soviet Union, is now inimical to free speech and freedom of oppression. She has become what once she opposed. I cannot express how deeply this grieves me.

What are the great crimes for which Southern and Pettibone have been denied entry, and detained and interrogated prior to being deported? Have they called for genocide? For physical attacks on immigrants, such as black South Africans are committing against Afrikaners, with the tacit support and even approval of the government there?

No, they simply want Britain to remain Britain, and other nations of the West to remain Western, and they oppose the uncontrolled migration of alien peoples with alien and inimical cultures into the West. And in the case of Southern, she has dared to film a documentary on the brutal attacks against white farmers (Boers, in Afrikaans) in South Africa – whose government has just voted to strip white farmers of their lands, without compensation.

And for this they are labeled “far right,” and “racist.” Southern and Pettibone (who ironically was on her way to a pro-free-speech rally), not the South African government!

It appears the UK government has learned the wrong lessons from WW II – it is totalitarianism which is to be opposed, not merely any views deemed to be on the political “right” – and has taken political inspiration, rather than a cautionary example, from the Soviet Union. The UK has, as I say, apparently become what it once opposed. This is a source of tremendous sadness for a life-long Anglophile like me!

Loving one’s own nation and people, its history and heritage, and being opposed to those bent on its destruction, is not racism, but sanity. But as one commenter put it,

“If ‘racism’ is a sufficient reason for preventing someone from entering the UK, why isn’t it a sufficient reason for kicking out of the UK all those non-white people who openly hate the white population? Of course nobody in authority has the slightest intention of answering that question – in fact they probably think that asking the question is in itself ‘racist.'”

Indeed, we have entered dark days.

CHURCH AND YOUTH: THE SHOCK OF THE OLD | Latest News – The Prayer Book Society

https://www-images.christianitytoday.com/images/39217.jpg?w=700

I have discovered that, alongside the depth that sustains my own prayer life, there is a remarkable breadth represented in the Prayer Book which, as a new generation tries to move beyond the toxic labels of the past, could provide a focal point for theological unity once more.

Source: CHURCH AND YOUTH: THE SHOCK OF THE OLD | Latest News – The Prayer Book Society

“I would, with tongue only slightly in cheek, suggest that liturgies such as Old Rite mass or Prayer Book evensong are truly inclusive, in that they are places where the churched, unchurched, and dechurched sit and allow the experience to wash over them. If even Richard Dawkins—a man who, I will admit, probably spends more time thinking about God than I do—can express affection for evensong, then I would suggest that there is an evangelistic potential in quiet dignity that we are not taking as seriously as we should. There is no introducing yourself to your neighbour, no enthusiastic hand-wringing at the Peace, no Blind Date-style “What’s your name, and where do you come from?” during the notices. There is simply the experience of being in the presence of holiness.

“For a generation for whom the majority of socialising no longer occurs face to face, and for whom encounters with anxiety are common, while ones with rooted community are not, this breathing space is invaluable. It allows a gentle introduction in terms of what is required socially, without compromising the authenticity of what is required intellectually; neither overly polarising nor overly patronising. It is a space that leaves room to contemplate mystery.”

Pure gold.

Read, mark learn, and inwardly digest.


Personal Note: I resonate strongly with this, because of my own personal history when it comes to the faith: I myself was brought (back) into it through The Book of Common Prayer. I came to the Anglican tradition in my mid-twenties. I had not grown up unchurched; far from it. Continue reading “CHURCH AND YOUTH: THE SHOCK OF THE OLD | Latest News – The Prayer Book Society”