… most recently, a restaurant (The Red Hen) in Lexington, Virginia, which refused service to Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders; Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen was hounded out of a restaurant by hecklers earlier in the week. On this occasion Nielsen was having a working meal with staff; but earlier she had to deal with protesters outsider her very home! And Sanders was simply trying to have a nice dinner with her family.
Can you imagine if similar officials in the Obama administration had been similarly treated? The elite-o-sphere would be ablaze with accusations of racism, bigotry, Nazism, and who-knows-what else!
At any rate, here’s Speaker Gingrich:
I think he’s right; unfortunately, dying beasts can do a lot of damage with their death throes…
“The special mark of the modern world is not that it is sceptical, but that it is dogmatic without knowing it. It says, in mockery of the old devotees, that they believed without knowing why they believed. But the moderns believe without knowing what they believe – and without even knowing that they do believe it. Their freedom consists in first freely assuming a creed, and then freely forgetting that they are assuming it. In short, they always have an unconscious dogma; and an unconscious dogma is the definition of a prejudice. They are the dullest and deadest of ritualists who merely recite their creed in their subconsciousness, as if they repeated their creed in their sleep. A man who is awake should know what he is saying, and why he is saying it – that is, he should have a fixed creed and relate it to a first principle. This is what most moderns will never consent to do. Their thoughts will work out to most interesting conclusions; but they can never tell you anything about their beginnings. They have always taken away the number they first thought of. They have always forgotten the very fact or fancy on which their whole theory depends.”
— G.K. Chesterton, March 15, 1919, Illustrated London News
And, ironically, in our present age it is often those who believe themselves to be the most “liberal,” the most “tolerant,” the most open-minded, who are, in fact, among the most dogmatic – and sometimes, the most repressive.
“Go forth in the pathway our forefathers trod;
We too fight for freedom, our Captain is God,
Their blood in our veins with the honours we vie;
Theirs too was the watchword, ‘We conquer or die.'”
— James Pierpoint
This is the rootedness in the strength of our past, and the resulting confidence in ourselves and our future, that we of the West have too-largely lost, these days. We need to get it back! We are of proud heritage – Greco-Roman and Germano-Celtic antiquity, and Medieval and Renaissance Christendom – which we badly need to re-embrace.
And yes, there are elements of the modern world which are also worth embracing and preserving: I wouldn’t be alive today without modern medicine, for one thing. But we need to sift the wheat from the chaff – not simply accept the whole programme uncritically – and that is something we have not been doing a very good job of accomplishing.
Nota Bene: The young lad, dressed in the uniform of a Scout, is being supported, encouraged, and inspired by figures representative of the three classes of people Western Christendom – and indeed, the pre-Christian West as well – have always considered to be essential to the proper functioning of a society: those who work, those who fight, and those who pray.
Those who work, support and maintain the society through the fruits of their labours. Those who fight, support and maintain the society by defending it from its enemies. And those who pray, support and maintain the society by offering supplication to God on its behalf, invoking God’s blessings upon it, and tending to its spiritual well-being.
Lacking any of these, a society is unbalanced and in danger of defeat or collapse. A principle we might do well to keep in mind!
“We need to remember that tolerance is not a Christian virtue. Charity, justice, mercy, prudence, honesty — these are Christian virtues. And obviously, in a diverse community, tolerance is an important working principle. But it’s never an end itself. In fact, tolerating grave evil within a society is itself a form of serious evil. Likewise, democratic pluralism does not mean that Catholics should be quiet in public about serious moral issues because of some misguided sense of good manners. A healthy democracy requires vigorous moral debate to survive. Real pluralism demands that people of strong beliefs will advance their convictions in the public square — peacefully, legally and respectfully, but energetically and without embarrassment. Anything less is bad citizenship and a form of theft from the public conversation.”
– Archbishop Charles Chaput
What the Archbishop says about (Roman) Catholics applies to all other Christians, as well.
If you can ignore the spelling / grammatical errors, this is actually a very good point. This is not the only reason it should be added – and I might use the word “leftists” rather than “liberals,” because today’s liberals, so-called, are a far cry from classical liberalism – but nonetheless!